Stupid Cunty little Pricks!

[tripperfunster]

So, devART has deleted two more pics. They've been too busy to reply to me, when I asked them to look into WHY my art was being deleted, but not too busy to send out their little SS brigade to delete more.

and one of them was


The note said it was a violation for UNDERAGED NUDITY. What, are his sleeves to short? Collar too low? *facepalm*

It would seem that they are just plain old not allowed to kiss.

Now I want to draw something that SEEMS completely porny, but isn't. Or draw something completely chaste, but put filthy things in the artist notes. You know, Harry reading a book, but THINKING ABOUT SNAPE SUCKING HIS LITTLE UNDERAGED COCK. Or maybe draw Harry and Snape as wrinkly old men, but making out. technically it would still be illegal, but ...?

*sigh*

When I was looking for a copy of the deleted art, I found this little gem left over from Peenlulz.

OMG I AM SUCH AN AMAZING ARTEEST!

I wish I remember what the prompt was!



I think I'll go post it over on devART. ;)

EDIT: They took four more down today, one of which I'd changed the notes and tags so that it didn't say anything about Harry Potter. And this one was Draco/Harry. (although I'd changed it to say nothing other than that the models were over 18)

Comments

[lucianwolf.livejournal.com]

I would beat them all with a sharp stick for you.

[clayangel.livejournal.com]

WTF? Can you argue that with them?

[scarletscarlet.livejournal.com]

But Harry doesn't even look underage in that first pic, THOUGH HE IS TOTALLY NAKED. I know that the skin on MY torso resembles a green shirt, isn't it the same for everyone?

[leela-cat.livejournal.com]

*blinks* I think someone simply needs to call it "art" because it certainly isn't "deviant" any longer. Sheesh. Talk about your false advertising.

And if you'd advertised that pic as "underage nudity", I'd have been suggesting (gently) that you needed glasses.

[alisanne.livejournal.com]

*shakes head*
They're crazy. That must be it, there's no other explanation.

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Hold on, let me make it more pointy first! *sharpens*

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Sure, I can argue all I like. Last time this happened, I asked for clarification, because I disagreed with it. This was a few months ago, and I've not heard back.

I doubt this will be any different.

The blanket caveat is "Under aged nudity OR showing minors in EROTIC situations."

*snerk* Yeah, this is erotica, all right!

I"ll just post them again in a few months, but change the tags and say they are different characters. Fuck them.

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Well, MY torso is magenta, but other than that, YES! Totes the same!

[schemingreader.livejournal.com]

You should preemptively pull down all your Snarry art from there and post it somewhere else instead. They're going to go after every single one of these, even if you post one in which Harry and Snape are in their 80s and rocking in chairs next to each other.

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Yes, it has been suggested that they should change the name to PEDESTRIAN ART, because aside from showing nude women in bondage EVERY FUCKIN' DAY AS A DAILY DEVIATION, there is very little there that is cutting edge at all.

And I don't need glasses! My slash goggles fit just fine! *adjusts them*

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Really? I thought that 'Right Wing Commie Bastards' went quite a ways to explain what is happening. ;)

[alisanne.livejournal.com]

Like I said... ;)

[leela-cat.livejournal.com]

LOL. Yeah. Your slash goggles are definitely the right prescription.

[tripperfunster.livejournal.com]

Nope. If they want them gone, then THEY can do the work.

I really should post them all to Walking the Plank, but it's haaarrd! *whine*

Perhaps I need a minion to do all my posting for me. :D

[schemingreader.livejournal.com]

I can't help you with Walking the Plank--I'll bet if you email one of the mods there, they will help you.

[xenafox.livejournal.com]

....

I have no words for the "NAKED HARRY wearing clothes". No fucking words, that doesn't even.. *cannot compute!!!!* Maybe we should flood them with complaints :D

[themostepotente.livejournal.com]

Underage nudity??? ZOMGWTFBBQ

I can't help but laugh at the absurdity of that. Major Fucking Fail.

[magically25.livejournal.com]

That just beggars belief, they really should change their site name as it is totally misleading (apart from what you've said before about having female naked bondage pics every day). I'll follow your work here on LJ.
I haven't bothered posting my more deviant stuff on DA as I know it would be pulled immediately as I ship mainly Snermione or Lumione, although never underage.
I don't suppose you know of other art sites that are less stupid and inconsistent?

[arcanetrivia]

even if you post one in which Harry and Snape are in their 80s and rocking in chairs next to each other.

BTW, Tripp, totally do this, okay?

[sra-danvers.livejournal.com]

XD Oh please, the last one is hilarious! ^^

[nimielle.livejournal.com]

This is ridiculous!

Although, thinking about it, they are totally naked under their clothes! Especially Harry, he's so naked under his clothes that he's projecting! That saucy little minx! ;)

[missgranger2.livejournal.com]

Utterly ridiculous. Why can't people just leave other people alone and mind their own damn business? Bunch of nazis!!!

)>:

[chocolate-frapp.livejournal.com]

that sucks, they're just being idiots.

[chocolate-frapp.livejournal.com]

I don't know you or anything but ICON LOVE!

[pern-dragon.livejournal.com]

You know, this is so absurd that I wonder what they'd do if all your followers got on there and posted the same pieces you had up that they took down (with clear credit to you as the artist, naturally). Would everyone get the same things removed, or are they only going after you (you troublemaker, you... *snort*). It's a thought... ;) Sorry you're having to deal with this fuckery. *hugs*