tripperfunster: (Default)
pfft!

So, my Steve/Tony picture that I posted yesterday got a stoopid comment over on dA.

Wanker: thats totally desgusting! (with a little barf emoticon)

So I go and look at his journal to see if he's like five years old or something, and it mostly features women in ass-enhancing poses like this:


Me: Yes, and all of your gratuitous ass-shots of women are tasteful. You certainly showed me, with your superior works of art!

Him: Even if you have the right of make what you want with your life, keep it to you and your kind, and put a mature content tag on your works, pls!

Me: My kind? Excuse me?
And two people 'almost' kissing does not require a mature tag.
Do you put mature tags on your pics of ladies sticking their butts out?


Him: two people of the same sex almost kissing (or even insinuating kiss) IS still mature for the normal people, child. The rules of DA do not demands mature content tags on art of type I make, but yes, I agree with you some of them needs them... I will provide that.

If you are not lesbian, I'm sorry for say you are. Your style are so meticulous and expressive that only homossexuals would work so tirelessly on that type of scene. (bolding mine)

I'm only express my opinion here about the theme, not the art. I think I have the right, like everyone here, so... I'm huge fan of those guy you pretend to be gays in the scene and I kind feel ofended with that. So I say. Thats it


Wait, what? I'm not sure if I should be offended on the behalf of all non-meticulous straight women, or on the behalf of all meticulous gays!

Then, hilariously someone named Mr.tonystark jumps in and gives him shit for being a dickhead.

My final reply: You are certainly allowed to have your opinion. You are also welcome to keep your bigotry to yourself. Hatred against gays (or any minority) is not only illegal, but also against the TOS of deviantArt.

I'm sure these fictional characters would also tell you that they are just fine without your 'help', thank you very much.


*sigh* What the fuck is wrong with people?
tripperfunster: (Default)
Honestly, it felt like Wednesday, like...two days ago.

I have two arts to show this week, so I'll just link ya, instead of re-posting.

Also, one of them is FIRST TIME art. I have never drawn Arthur Weasley's penis before, and now, I HAVE! Aren't you all just so proud of me???

Plus, one nekkid Snape, to counteract the Weasley-ness of the whole thing. (no, not together).

Today's smut

Also, I never posted my smut from last week. For shame!

Let's remedy that, shall we?

/smut announcement

Oh, and hump-day got wanked here:http://community.livejournal.com/sf_drama/571160.html
Wow. Some people just ... don't have a sense of humour. Gosh, it's been a long, long time since I was fourteen, but I *think* I had a sense of lulz, even back then. What IS it with todays teenagers anyway? *g*
tripperfunster: (Default)
I posted this somewhere else, in response to a huge Wankfest that I don't even want to get into again (no, it wasn't about me) but it was about artists using/copying references. I use references, but I don't trace them, but occasionally, I draw closely enough to get results like this.

This is sort of a post about nothing, but I kind of think the drawings look cool when matched up/placed over the original reference. Hence this post. )



In case I'm not being clear, this is my art interspersed with the original reference photos. Shit, if nothing else, it makes me realize I need to use WAY more reds when doing skin tones! :D

ETA: In the 'kissing House' one, he's kissing Stacy in the original, and I stuck Wilson in there, so I put that one at a lower opacity so you could see the two(three) of them there.

Profile

tripperfunster: (Default)
tripperfunster

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 11:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios